My critique of that booklet, which I wrote in the late 1980s, is available at:
http://www.jwstudies.com/The_Watchtowers_Handling_of_Blood_Revision_2.pdf
Doug
anyone have it handy?
if so let me know and i will pm my email addy.
My critique of that booklet, which I wrote in the late 1980s, is available at:
http://www.jwstudies.com/The_Watchtowers_Handling_of_Blood_Revision_2.pdf
Doug
i had hoped one or two others were about to start a thread on the book of daniel, springing off from the nwt conversation, but alas, nobody has yet.
therefore, i thought i'd start one--i hope that was not too presumptuous of me.
personally, i have nothing meaty to contribute to this thread, only questions and gut feelings.
Londo,
My study on Daniel 9 (the 70 heptads") is available at:
http://www.jwstudies.com/Critique_of_GM_on_Daniel_9.pdf
Do not assume that time periods mentioned in Daniel 9 relate to the ministry and death of Jesus Christ.
Doug
so sayeth the f&ds on page 26 of the 2/2012 wt.
under the title "why does god have an organization?
" it says "god chose the israelites to be his witnesses.
Ucantnome,
I agree with you. Isaiah 43:10 was written at the time of the Babylonian Captivity, and the people were being told that they had witnessed YHWH yet they had failed him.
Because they had done so despite having witnessed him, the nation was being punished and indeed it was YHWH's intention to destroy them (Isa 43:28 -- read the whole context).
Doug
think we had september 2011, then it was dec 21, 2011....i'm trying to get ahead of the game here....so what is the next date after dec 2011?
dec 2012?
the masonic capstone at the denver airport says we should open it in the year 2094...wow you better go tell them to open it sooner..
If you search the www, you should be able to find when the sun is expected to burn up and explode, engulfing this world in the process. I don't remember the figure, but it would be in the billions of years, I expect.
Enjoy this life and before you leave, know that you have made a positive contribution.
Doug
jesus and his apostles were once found eating other people's wheat yield.
however the law in question was reported to be the sabbath; so it must not have been considered stealing?.
regardless, how did they earn money?
“Mary (called Magdalene) from whom seven demons had come out; Joanna the wife of Cuza, the manager of Herod’s household; Susanna; and many others. These women were helping to support them out of their own means.” (Luke 8:2-3, NIV)
i am confused, so was it constantine who created the first canon or was it athanasius throught constantine, or was it just athanasius before constantine?.
Joey Jo-Jo.
I recommend three books that provide excellent descriptions of the events of those first four centuries. I presume you will be able to read details online about these books:
“JESUS WARS: How Four Patriarchs, Three Queens, and Two Emperors Decided What Christians Would Believe for the Next 1500 Years” by Philip Jenkins (The Fifth-Century Political Battles That Forever Changed What the Church Teaches About the Son of God.)
“AD 381: HERETICS, PAGANS AND THE CHRISTIAN STATE” by Charles Freeman. ( In AD 381, Theodosius, emperor of the eastern Roman empire, issued a decree in which all of his subjects were required to subscribe to a belief in the Trinity of the Father, Son and Holy Spirit. This edict defined Christian orthodoxy and brought to an end a lively and wide ranging debate about the nature of the Godhead; all other interpretations were now declared heretical. Moreover, for the first time in a thousand years of Greco-Roman civilisation, free thought was unambiguously suppressed.)
“A NEW HISTORY OF CHRISTIANITY” by Charles Freeman. ( Freeman shows that there was a host of competing Christianities, many of which had as much claim to authenticity as those that eventually dominated. The imposition of ‘correct belief and an institutional framework that enforced orthodoxy were both consolidating and stifling. Uncovering the church’s relationships with Judaism, Gnosticism, Greek philosophy and Greco-Roman society, Freeman offers dramatic new accounts of Paul, the resurrection, and the church fathers and emperors.)
Doug
the christ hymn in philippians 2:6-11.
(the authentic letters of paul, arthur j. dewey and others, pages 194 -196).
several of the terms used in verses 6 to 8 echo the terminology found in the story of the creation and fall of adam in genesis 1 and 3 in the greek translation of the hebrew bible (the septuagint) that paul and all of the authors of the writings that comprise the new testament knew and used.
The “Christ Hymn” in Philippians 2:6-11
(“The Authentic Letters of Paul”, Arthur J. Dewey and others, pages 194 -196)
Several of the terms used in verses 6 to 8 echo the terminology found in the story of the creation and fall of Adam in Genesis 1 and 3 in the Greek translation of the Hebrew Bible (the Septuagint) that Paul and all of the authors of the writings that comprise the New Testament knew and used. Adam is said to have been created in the image and likeness of God (Gen 1:26-27); and he succumbs to the "Serpent's" seductive suggestion that, if he asserted himself, he would become equal to God (Gen 3:5). The similarity of the language in Phil 2:6-8 to the language in these Genesis passages points to another way of reading the "Christ Hymn:" as contrasting the First and Second Adam—a contrast Paul explicitly draws in Rom 5:12-14, and in 1 Cor 15:21-23,45-50. The contrast between the First and Second Adam reflected in the "Christ Hymn" can be charted in this way:
First Adam
bearing the image of God
he regarded being like God
as something to use for his own advantage
with vain pretention he asserted himself
and rejected his lot as a servant
he exalted himself
his disobedience led to his death
he was condemned by God
and cast out of paradise
Second Adam
bearing the image of God
he did not regard being like God
as something to use for his own advantage
he rid himself of vain pretentions
and accepted his lot as a servant
he humbled himself
he was obedient to the death even death by crucifixion
he was exalted by God
and named lord of all
The meaning of this passage is also related to its structure. ... A more recent structural analysis sees the "hymn" as organized in four strophes. ... This analysis of the "hymn's" structure is consistent with the view that the hymn intends to contrast the First and Second Adams. The First Adam ... mishandled his status as a creature and blundered into self-exaltation that resulted in his self-destruction. The Second Adam rightly handled his status as a creature and was approved by God as a model of how a human being should conduct himself, and was exalted as the prototype and lord of a recreated human race. ... The structure of the passage together with its idiomatic, allusive, and celebrative (not literal) language indicate that its author did not intend to speak about the descent and ascent of a divine being, but about the exemplary earthly life of Jesus as a human being. God endorsed that exemplary life by raising Jesus on high as the Second Adam, who represents the remedy for the failure of the First Adam.
how did those whale bones get into the atacama desert, if you have been there, it is a barren wasteland.
i belive it might have been caused by the flood, but again i am one who belives in god.
what do you think of this find, jesus or non-intelligence?
I am absolutely amazed that there is someone who believes the Creation myths are literal. Do they think the stories were written by people who saw what was happening?
These two Creation stories were written about the time of the neo-Babylonian Captivity for the religious objectives of the writers. Genesis 2:4b - 25 was written first, and exhibits distinct inconsistencies with the later story, which ends at ch 2:4a.
Doug
the wt starts its seventy years with the moment that jews entered egypt following the murder of governor gedaliah.
the wt guesses that the destruction and the murder of gedaliah took place in the same year.
however, the events listed in the bible as taking place from the time of the city's destruction until the entry in egypt require far more than two months.
ScenicViewer,
Have a look at the Italian site; there is at least one English passage that is directly cited.
I touch on the subject (in English) at pages 22 to 24 of my study at:
http://www.jwstudies.com/Onscreen_Critique__October_Watchtower__Jerusalem_Destroyed.pdf
The problem is for the WTS to PROVE that the Jews exited Judah in the same year when Jerusalem was destroyed. There is no agreement on the time from the destruction to the entry into Egypt. For example, the Jewish Encyclopedia acknowledges the range of views, from two months (tradition only) to 4 years:
"The rule of Gedaliah lasted, according to tradition, only two months, although Grätz argues that it continued more than four years." http://www.jewishencyclopedia.com/articles/6548-gedallah
The WT cannot prove the year when the Jews entered Egypt and they cannot PROVE the year that the first exiles returned to the site of the destroyed temple at Jerusalem. They cannot prove that it happened in 537; because there is no positive evidence, there is a wide range of views, as can be seen by Googling:
jews return 538
jews return 536
jews return 535
Doug
the wt starts its seventy years with the moment that jews entered egypt following the murder of governor gedaliah.
the wt guesses that the destruction and the murder of gedaliah took place in the same year.
however, the events listed in the bible as taking place from the time of the city's destruction until the entry in egypt require far more than two months.
The WT starts its Seventy Years with the moment that Jews entered Egypt following the murder of Governor Gedaliah. The WT guesses that the destruction and the murder of Gedaliah took place in the same year. However, the events listed in the Bible as taking place from the time of the city's destruction until the entry in Egypt require far more than two months. The period from the destruction to the entry into Egypt was likely 2, 3 or even 4 years long.
A discussion in Italian on the subject can be seen at:
http://www.infotdgeova.it/storia/quando70.php
The PDF file is available at:
http://www.infotdgeova.it/downloads/70anni.pdf
Doug